Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.5% more intelligence, 48.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 25.2 | +56.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 56.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $427.73 | −48.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 48.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.13s | 46.20s | +76.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 76.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill