Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) scores 11.5 points higher (27.6 vs 16.1) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1165 vs $823; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 27.6 | +71.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 71.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $1,165.00 | +41.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 41.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 56.04s | +100.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 100.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 71.4% more intelligence, 41.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 100.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill