Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 32.2 points higher (47.8 vs 15.6) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($361 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 47.8 | +206.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $361.37 | +131.8% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.09s | 13.60s | +123.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 123.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 206.4% more intelligence, 131.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 123.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-6-1-sol-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-6-1-sol-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill