Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Hy3 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 62.2% more intelligence, 4.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 441.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 25.3 | +62.2% Hy3 is 62.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $149.61 | −4.0% Hy3 is 4.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 33.29s | +441.3% Hy3 is 441.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteHy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill