Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash scores 25.5 points higher (41.1 vs 15.6) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1015 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 41.1 | +163.5% Ling 3.1 Flash is 2.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $1,014.56 | +550.9% Ling 3.1 Flash is 6.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 13.61s | +121.3% Ling 3.1 Flash is 121.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 163.5% more intelligence, 550.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 121.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLing 3.1 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill