Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 10.4 points higher (26.0 vs 15.6) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 26.0 | +66.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 66.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $231.08 | +48.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 48.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.08s | 49.53s | +714.6% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 714.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 66.7% more intelligence, 48.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 714.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill