Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 142.9% more intelligence, 29.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 712.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 37.9 | +142.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $109.55 | −29.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 29.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.06s | 49.26s | +712.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 712.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill