Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 8.7 points higher (29.7 vs 21.0) but costs 72× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $27.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 21.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) when 21.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 21.0 | −29.3% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 29.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $27.02 | −98.6% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 98.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 5.90s | −78.9% GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is 78.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 29.3% less intelligence, 98.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/gpt-5-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/gpt-5-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill