Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 23.2 points higher (29.7 vs 6.5) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 6.5 | −78.1% Llama 4 Scout is 78.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $73.56 | −96.2% Llama 4 Scout is 96.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.47s | 4.99s | −79.6% Llama 4 Scout is 79.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 78.1% less intelligence, 96.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLlama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill