Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 27.6% more intelligence, 94.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 102.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 37.9 | +27.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 27.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $109.55 | −94.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 94.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.32s | 49.26s | +102.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 102.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill