Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 22.7 points higher (52.4 vs 29.7) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 52.4 | +76.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 76.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $5,786.78 | +199.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.32s | 40.70s | +67.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 67.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 76.4% more intelligence, 199.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill