Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 21.9 points higher (29.7 vs 7.8) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 7.8 | −73.7% Solar Pro 3 is 73.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $159.22 | −91.8% Solar Pro 3 is 91.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.21s | 18.89s | −22.0% Solar Pro 3 is 22.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 73.7% less intelligence, 91.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill