Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-5.6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) scores 20.1 points higher (42.3 vs 22.2) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 22.2, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 22.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 42.3 | +90.5% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 90.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $1,487.34 | +306.8% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.59s | 13.86s | +44.5% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 44.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 90.5% more intelligence, 306.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-5.6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-5-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-5-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill