Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 1.4 points higher (22.2 vs 20.8) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($337 vs $256; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 20.8 | −6.3% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 6.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $337.15 | $255.77 | −24.1% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 24.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.50s | 5.11s | −46.2% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 46.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 6.3% less intelligence, 24.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill