Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (High)
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 48.2% more intelligence, 86.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 32.9 | +48.2% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 48.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $47.85 | −86.9% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 86.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.09s | 14.65s | +61.2% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 61.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill