Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) scores 22.0 points higher (44.2 vs 22.2) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($855 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 44.2 | +99.1% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 99.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $854.60 | +133.7% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.51s | 42.43s | +346.2% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 346.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 99.1% more intelligence, 133.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 346.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-6-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-6-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill