Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 8.2 points higher (22.2 vs 14.0) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($366 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 14.0 | −36.9% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 36.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $250.37 | −31.5% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 31.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.59s | 5.89s | −38.6% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 38.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 36.9% less intelligence, 31.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGrok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill