Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 70.7% more intelligence, 70.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 475.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 37.9 | +70.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 70.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $109.55 | −70.0% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 70.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.60s | 49.53s | +475.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 475.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill