Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 7.0 points higher (29.2 vs 22.2) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick MiniMax-M3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 29.2 | +31.5% MiniMax-M3 is 31.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $537.98 | +47.1% MiniMax-M3 is 47.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.69s | 25.47s | +193.1% MiniMax-M3 is 193.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 31.5% more intelligence, 47.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 193.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill