Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Mistral Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) scores 11.4 points higher (23.1 vs 11.7) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($936 vs $654; both premium class). Pick Mistral Large 4 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Large 4 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.7 | 23.1 | +97.4% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 97.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $653.82 | $936.36 | +43.2% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 43.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.75s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 97.4% more intelligence, 43.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $573.
- Mistral Large 4 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMistral Large 4 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mistral-large-4-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mistral-large-4-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill