Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 13.6 points higher (25.3 vs 11.7) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3922 vs $654; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 11.7, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 11.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.7 | 25.3 | +116.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $653.82 | $3,922.39 | +499.9% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 6.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.87s | 24.37s | +209.7% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 209.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 116.2% more intelligence, 499.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 209.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $573.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 55.30 for $3746.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mistral-large-4-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mistral-large-4-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill