Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 17.4 points higher (39.6 vs 22.2) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 22.2, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 22.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 39.6 | +78.4% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 78.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $1,385.40 | +278.9% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 3.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.59s | 22.03s | +129.7% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 129.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 78.4% more intelligence, 278.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 129.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMuse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill