Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 16.7 points higher (38.9 vs 22.2) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 22.2, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 22.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 38.9 | +75.2% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 75.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $1,184.90 | +224.1% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.50s | 17.34s | +104.0% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 104.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 75.2% more intelligence, 224.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 104.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMuse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill