Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 9.5 points higher (22.2 vs 12.7) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($337 vs $234; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 12.7 | −42.8% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 42.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $337.15 | $233.56 | −30.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 30.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.50s | 22.73s | +139.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 139.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 42.8% less intelligence, 30.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 139.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteQwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill