Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores 11.4 points higher (22.2 vs 10.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($366 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 10.8 | −51.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 51.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $232.95 | −36.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 36.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.60s | 8.30s | −3.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.4% less intelligence, 36.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill