Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 56.4% more intelligence, 84.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 418.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 51.0 | +56.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 56.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $662.28 | −84.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 84.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 86.31s | +418.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 418.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill