Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 20.1 points higher (52.7 vs 32.6) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $4222; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash (High).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 52.7 | +61.7% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 61.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $5,324.10 | +26.1% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 26.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 275.53s | +1554.8% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 1554.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 61.7% more intelligence, 26.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1554.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill