Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (High)
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 0.9% more intelligence, 98.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 32.9 | +0.9% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 0.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $47.85 | −98.9% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 98.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.57s | 14.65s | −11.6% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 11.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)GPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill