Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 6.8 points higher (32.6 vs 25.8) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 25.8 | −20.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 20.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $992.88 | −76.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 76.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.46s | 45.91s | +178.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 178.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 20.9% less intelligence, 76.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 178.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill