Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-31.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) scores 9.0 points higher (52.0 vs 43.0) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1042 vs $545; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.0 | 43.0 | −17.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 17.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,042.43 | $544.58 | −47.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 47.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.65s | 62.49s | +218.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 218.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (high): 17.3% less intelligence, 47.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 218.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Grok 4.6 (medium) scores 59.00 for $930.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill