Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) scores 6.7 points higher (33.0 vs 26.3) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($2172 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.0 | 26.3 | −20.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 20.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,172.43 | $992.88 | −54.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 54.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.40s | 41.22s | +124.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 124.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (high): 20.3% less intelligence, 54.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 124.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Spark 1.3 (max) scores 48.20 for $2000.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill