Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 42.0% more intelligence, 95.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 190.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 46.3 | +42.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 42.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $206.66 | −95.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 95.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 48.29s | +190.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 190.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill