Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 23.3 points higher (32.6 vs 9.3) but costs 91× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $46.4; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 9.3 | −71.5% Mistral Large 3 is 71.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $46.41 | −98.9% Mistral Large 3 is 98.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 7.18s | −56.9% Mistral Large 3 is 56.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 71.5% less intelligence, 98.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill