Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 18.4 points higher (32.6 vs 14.2) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 14.2, and Mistral Medium 3.5 when 14.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 14.2 | −56.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 56.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $1,263.80 | −70.1% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 70.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.46s | 17.77s | +8.0% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 8.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 56.4% less intelligence, 70.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill