Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 19.8 points higher (52.4 vs 32.6) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $4222; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash (High).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 52.4 | +60.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 60.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $5,786.78 | +37.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 37.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.52s | 40.70s | +146.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 146.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 60.7% more intelligence, 37.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 146.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill