Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 12.4 points higher (32.6 vs 20.2) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3534 vs $2022; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 20.2 | −38.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 38.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,534.07 | $2,022.49 | −42.8% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 42.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.13s | 14.28s | −16.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 16.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 38.0% less intelligence, 42.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill