Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 24.8 points higher (32.6 vs 7.8) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $159; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 7.8 | −76.1% Solar Pro 3 is 76.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $159.22 | −96.2% Solar Pro 3 is 96.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.63s | 18.89s | +13.6% Solar Pro 3 is 13.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 76.1% less intelligence, 96.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill