Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs GPT-6 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 5.6 points higher (39.8 vs 34.2) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $269; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 34.2, and GPT-6 Sol (Low) when 34.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 34.2 | −14.1% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 14.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $268.73 | −75.6% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 75.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.18s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 14.1% less intelligence, 75.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)GPT-6 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/gpt-6-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/gpt-6-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill