Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 14.5 points higher (39.8 vs 25.3) but costs 7.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $150; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 25.3 | −36.4% Hy3 is 36.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $149.61 | −86.4% Hy3 is 86.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 33.13s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Hy3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 36.4% less intelligence, 86.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill