Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) by Google or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) scores 14.2 points higher (40.0 vs 25.8) but costs 7.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $149; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Hy3 when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.0 | 25.8 | −35.5% Hy3 is 35.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $149.44 | −86.4% Hy3 is 86.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.32s | 29.10s | +182.0% Hy3 is 182.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.14 / $0.55 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Hy3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium): 35.5% less intelligence, 86.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 182.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 26.40 for $138.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill