Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 33.3 points higher (39.8 vs 6.5) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 6.5 | −83.7% Llama 4 Scout is 83.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $73.56 | −93.3% Llama 4 Scout is 93.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 4.99s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 83.7% less intelligence, 93.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill