Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 13.8 points higher (39.8 vs 26.0) but costs 4.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $231; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 26.0 | −34.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 34.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $231.08 | −79.0% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 79.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 49.36s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 34.7% less intelligence, 79.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill