Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) by Google or MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) scores 13.6 points higher (40.0 vs 26.4) but costs 8.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $138; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) when you need intelligence above 26.4, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.0 | 26.4 | −34.0% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 34.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $138.26 | −87.4% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 87.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.32s | 72.58s | +603.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 603.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium): 34.0% less intelligence, 87.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 603.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)MiMo-V2.5-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill