Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 13.3% more intelligence, 97.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 34.1 | +13.3% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 13.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,546.75 | $95.73 | −97.9% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 97.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.00s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill