Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 30.9 points higher (39.8 vs 8.9) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $63.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 8.9 | −77.6% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 77.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $63.74 | −94.2% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 94.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 10.29s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 77.6% less intelligence, 94.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill