Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 24.2 points higher (39.8 vs 15.6) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $661; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 15.6 | −60.8% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 60.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $661.29 | −39.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 39.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 21.43s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 60.8% less intelligence, 39.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill