Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores 0.1 points higher (39.9 vs 39.8) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2632 vs $1100; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 39.9 | +0.3% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 0.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $2,632.05 | +139.3% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 61.67s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 0.3% more intelligence, 139.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill