Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 30.6 points higher (39.8 vs 9.2) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 9.2 | −76.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 76.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $405.10 | −63.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 63.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.44s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 76.9% less intelligence, 63.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill