Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 1.1 points higher (40.9 vs 39.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $1100; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 39.8 | −2.7% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 2.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $1,100.06 | −32.2% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 32.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.19s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 2.7% less intelligence, 32.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gemini-3-8-flash-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gemini-3-8-flash-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill