Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 14.8 points higher (40.9 vs 26.1) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $1487; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.1 (Reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 26.1 | −36.2% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 36.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $1,486.78 | −8.4% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 8.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.19s | 60.76s | +94.8% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 94.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $1.28 / $4.07 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 36.2% less intelligence, 8.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/glm-5-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/glm-5-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill